Webteam April 2021

webteam@pcpress.info

3 participants
6 discussions

Za vesti / tekstove
by Dejan Ristanovic 29 Apr '21

29 Apr '21

Ima ovde zanimljivog materijala o Intel-ovim novim procesorima i oko njih... moglo bi da se iskoristi za nešto za sajt, možda i za broj. Pozdrav, Dejan

1 0

ista slika, dva teksta
by Danijela Kudrić 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

Kolege, Na dva različita teksta imamo istu nosiću fotografiju, na naslovnoj strani. https://pcpress.rs/microsoft-najavljuje-nove-funkcije-za-outlook-i-teams-u-f unkciji-blagostanja/ https://pcpress.rs/google-maps-ima-i-druge-funkcije-osim-navigacije/ Pozdrav, Danijela Kudrić Milićević Marketing PC Press | Osmana Đikića 4 | 11000 Beograd | Srbija Tel: +381 11 2080-220 Mob: +381 63 821 69 23 E-mail: <mailto:danijela@pcpress.info> danijela(a)pcpress.rs cid:image002.jpg@01D4A9BD.D0A47960

2 1

Kako potrošiti 16 milijardi
by Dejan Ristanovic 12 Apr '21

12 Apr '21

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/12/microsoft-buys-nuance-communications-in-16-b illion-deal.html

1 0

Šverceri
by Dejan Ristanovic 08 Apr '21

08 Apr '21

Nekad su se švercovali i krali zlato i dijamanti, a sada grafički procesori... <https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nvidia-gpus-smuggled-in-hong-kong-r aid/> www.digitaltrends.com /computing/nvidia-gpus-smuggled-in-hong-kong-raid/ 300 Nvidia GPUs Smuggled in Mission Impossible-Style Raid | Digital Trends By Jacob Roach April 7, 2021 1:31PM PST3-4 minutes 4/7/2021 _____ The GPU market has <https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/gpu-shortage-q3-2020-double-triple- price/> been in a tailspin over the last several months, and now, the coveted cards are showing up in the hands of Chinese smugglers. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0grAY6kgexY> TVP News reports that the Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department intercepted a fishing boat outside of Hong Kong International Airport, busting a smuggling ring that was transporting up to 300 Nvidia CMP 30HX graphics cards. In a scene ripped straight from Mission Impossible, Hong Kong authorities chased the group of smugglers in a speed boat in the early hours of the morning. Although the smugglers got away, the owner of the boat loaded with goods did not. Among typical fodder for smugglers, including exotic foods, skincare products, and smartphones, the Hong Kong authorities seized 300 unmarked graphics cards in the 2 a.m. raid. The cards appear to be Nvidia's Cryptocurrency Mining Processor (CMP), or more specifically, the CMP 30HX. The 30HX is the lowest of the range, with an advertised Ethereum hash rate of 26 MH/s. Although the CMP 30HX isn't available in the U.S., it has <https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-cmp-30hx-mining-gpu-market-723-dol lars> been spotted for $723 at a retailer in Dubai. That's $219,600 worth of graphics cards. For some context, a GTX 980 and a GTX 1660 both have a higher Ethereum hash rate. These cards shouldn't be more than $200, but both are commonly selling above the $500 mark on secondhand markets. It's clear that gamers and enthusiasts weren't the target of the smuggling operation. Without any video outputs, the CMP 30HX is good for cryptocurrency mining and nothing else. Perhaps the mining market is larger than most expect, or maybe consumer GPUs just aren't available to smuggle. Regardless, one thing remains clear: GPU demand is at an all-time high. The smugglers were clued into other shifts in the world of tech, too. Along with a tear-jerking number of graphics cards, Hong Kong officials seized several kits of system RAM, likely in preparation for <https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ram-memory-price-increase-semicondu ctor-shortage/> DRAM price increases coming down the pike. The owner of the ship was detained by authorities, but the other smugglers made off to mainland China. As for the cards, they'll likely live in a cold evidence room, much to the dismay of anyone looking for a little GPU horsepower.

1 0

Supreme Court rules in Google's favor in copyright dispute with Oracle over Android software
by Dejan Ristanovic 05 Apr '21

05 Apr '21

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/05/supreme-court-rules-in-googles-favor-in-cop… Supreme Court rules in Google’s favor in copyright dispute with Oracle over Android software Tucker Higgins The Supreme Court on Monday sided with Google against Oracle in a long-running copyright dispute over the software used in Android, the mobile operating system. The court’s decision was 6-2. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was not yet confirmed by the Senate when the case was argued in October, did not participate in the case. The case concerned about 12,000 lines of code that Google used to build Android that were copied from the Java application programming interface developed by Sun Microsystems, which Oracle acquired in 2010. It was seen as a landmark dispute over what types of computer code are protected under American copyright law. Oracle had claimed at points to be owed as much as $9 billion, while Google claimed that its use of the code was covered under the doctrine of fair use and therefore not subject to copyright liability. Android is the most popular mobile operating system in the world. Oracle sued Google over the use of its code and won its case twice before the specialized U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which held that the code in question was copyrightable and that Google’s use of it not protected by fair use. The Supreme Court reversed the appeals court’s decision, though it did not definitively resolve whether the code in question was copyrightable. Read more: Justices wary of upending tech industry in Google v. Oracle Supreme Court fight Justice Stephen Breyer, who wrote the majority opinion in the case, agreed that Google’s use of the code was protected under fair use, noting that Google took “only what was needed to allow users to put their accrued talents to work in a new and transformative program.” “To the extent that Google used parts of the Sun Java API to create a new platform that could be readily used by programmers, its use was consistent with that creative ‘progress’ that is the basic constitutional objective of copyright itself,” Breyer added. Breyer said that the top court assumed “for argument’s sake” that the code was copyrightable in the first place, but declined to issue a ruling on that question, saying that the holding on fair use was enough to decide the case. “Given the rapidly changing technological, economic, and business-related circumstances, we believe we should not answer more than is necessary to resolve the parties’ dispute,” Breyer wrote. Breyer was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented. The case, one of the most significant of the term, featured a high-profile battle over competing visions of the future of software development. “The long settled practice of reusing software interfaces is critical to modern software development,” Google’s attorney, the veteran Supreme Court lawyer Tom Goldstein, told the justices during arguments. The case was originally scheduled to be heard last term before it was delayed as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. This is breaking news. Please check back for updates. Sent from my iPad 2018

1 0

Apple VR
by Dejan Ristanovic 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Ako pričamo o rumorima... https://www.macrumors.com/2021/03/31/apple-headset-next-several-months/

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

Webteam April 2021